Evaluation of the efficiency of chitosan and silver nanoparticles in the treatment of lice experimental infestation in local chickens

Article information

Korean J Vet Res. 2024;64.e12
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 June 28
doi : https://doi.org/10.14405/kjvr.20240019
1General Directorate of Education at Al-Qadisiyah, Ministry of Education. Al-Diwaniyah 68004, Iraq
2Department of Biology, Faculty of Education, University of AL-Qadisiyah, Al Quadisiya 58002, Iraq
*Corresponding author: Sadiya Aziz Anah Department of Biology. Faculty of Education, University of AL-Qadisiyah, Al Quadisiya 58002, Iraq Tel: +964-07810075351 E-mail: sadiya.anah@qu.edu.iq
Received 2024 April 16; Revised 2024 May 22; Accepted 2024 May 24.

Abstract

The current study aimed to determine the effect of silver and chitosan nanoparticles of size 10 to 30 nm on the dead of lice in vitro and in vivo to determine the optimal time and concentration to combat chicken lice. One hundred local chickens Gallus gallus domesticus were collected from Al-Diwaniyah province and 6 species of local chicken lice were isolated: Menacanthus stramineus, Menacanthus pallidullus, Menacanthus cornutus, Goniodes gigas, Cuclotogaster heterographus and Bonomiella columbae. The results of treating lice with chitosan and silver nanoparticles at concentrations (40, 60, and 80 mg/mL) in vitro and at different periods (5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes) after treatment showed that chitosan and silver nanoparticles at a concentration of 80 mg/mL are the most effective in killing lice. The dead rate of lice reached 100% after 15 minutes of treatment with chitosan nanoparticles and 100% in the case of silver nanoparticles after 30 minutes. The results of spraying chitosan and silver nanoparticles on the body of chickens infected with lice experimentally, based on the relative therapeutic efficacy within 30 minutes, indicated that silver nanoparticles were the most effective in completely killing lice in the group treated with a concentration of 80 mg/kg after 30 minutes, where the percentage of therapeutic efficacy was 96.7%. This was followed by chitosan nanoparticles at a concentration of 80 mg/kg, and the percentage of therapeutic efficiency was 91.5%. Chitosan and silver nanocomposite have a promising effect in the elimination of lice infestation in chickens.

Introduction

Due to the resistance shown by many insects towards chemical pesticides due to excessive use, it has been observed in recent years a great trend towards nanomedicine to combat parasites of various species [1], as it has been proven that nanoparticles (NPs) can be used to treat diseases of various species may be bacterial, viral, fungal or parasitic [2]. Some materials, when reduced to nano size, undergo a change in their properties, leading to the possibility of using them on a large scale to monitor, diagnose, treat and combat infectious diseases [3]. NPs have well-defined chemical, mechanical, and optical properties and one of their properties is their cytotoxic effect, which varies with size, shape, charge, purity, and stability [4].

Chitosan is a polysaccharide polymer derived from chitin and produced by removing the acetate portion of it, it is extracted from the shells of crustaceans such as crabs as well as from the cell walls of fungi, it is a biodegradable and biocompatible polymer that is considered safe for human food use and is approved for wound dressing. It has been approved by Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for tissue engineering and drug delivery [5], and recent research indicates its use as a pesticide for external parasites such as the hard tick parasitic on livestock [6], and in another study, Attia et al. [7] indicated that spraying chitosan NPs on pigeons infected with the fly Pseudolynchia canariensis in cages for 15 minutes gave a promising result as an anti-parasitic agent as well as healing the wound resulting from the insect bite. Silver NPs are used in various fields such as medicine, food, healthcare, consumer and industrial purposes [810], and due to their physical and chemical properties, they have been used in many applications, including antibacterial agents. In diagnostics, orthopedics, wound dressings, biomedical devices, drug delivery, and as anticancer agents [1113].

Silver NPs, AgNPs, were used as an alternative for the treatment and control of the red chicken mite Dermanyssus gallinae [14]. AgNPs extracted from Euphorbia hirta leaves were tested against Anopheles stephensi, and these molecules showed high larval killing activity [15]. AgNPs synthesized from the fungal species Chrysosporium keratinophilum and Verticillium lecanii also showed good activity against pupae and larvae of A. stephensi, Culex quinquefasciatus, and Aedes aegypti [16]. In another study, Attia et al. [7] concluded that spraying pigeons experimentally infected with the P. canariensis fly with low concentrations of silver NPs had an effective role in controlling most of the flies, as it acted as an effective biopesticide.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

The Committee of the Department of Biology, Faculty of Education, University of AL-Qadisiyah approved this study (No. 986).

Isolation of lice samples

During the period from July 2023 to March 2024, 100 local chickens Gallus gallus domesticus were collected from Al-Diwaniyah province, and 6 species of biting lice were identified, Menacanthus stramineus, Menacanthus pallidullus, Menacanthus cornutus, Cuclotogaster heterographus, Bonomiella columbae, and Goniodes gigas, its diagnosed based on [17].

Characteristics of nanoparticles used in the study

The nanocomposites were purchased in the form of ready-made silver NPs from one of the accredited American companies, Sky Spring Nanoparticles Inc., and the chitosan belongs to a Canadian company, Nanochemazone Inc., in powder form, with a purity of 99.8% and a size of 10 to 30 nanometers for both chitosan and silver NPs. Ag NPs appearance dark grey powder while chitosan NPs were white in color (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

(A) Silver nanoparticle. (B) Chitosan nanoparticles.

Preparation of different concentrations of chitosan and silver nanocomposites

A stock solution was prepared from the 2 nanocomposites, chitosan and silver, by dissolving 1 g of each separately in 200 mL of distilled water for each one. The solutions were sterilized with an autoclave, then each solution was mixed using an ultrasonic homogenizer for 15 minutes, then 3 concentrations were prepared for each one 40, 60, and 80 mg/mL and kept in the refrigerator until used in the experiment [18].

Experimental and laboratory study

Role concentrations of chitosan and silver nanoparticles on the mortality rates on lice in vitro

This experiment was conducted to test the effectiveness of 3 different concentrations of 40, 60, and 80 mg/mL for each of the chitosan and silver NPs on lice parasitizing chickens in vitro. Seven Petri dishes were used and an equal number of lice (8) were placed in each dish, the first dish was treated with a concentration of 40 mg/mL of ChNPs, the 2nd dish was treated with a concentration of 60 mg/mL of ChNPs, the third dish was treated with a concentration of 80 mg/mL of ChNPs, dish 4 was treated with a concentration of 40 mg/mL of AgNPs, and dish 5 was treated with a concentration of 60 mg/mL of AgNPs, while dish 6 was treated with a concentration of 80 mg/mL of AgNPs, while plate 7 was left as a control group. After that, the dishes were observed under a microscope for 3 replicates during different times (5, 10, 15, and 30) minutes, in order to determine the numbers of live and dead lice. After that, the optimal time for the effectiveness of this substance with its different concentrations against lice parasitizing on chickens was determined.

Role concentrations of chitosan and silver nanoparticles on the mortality rates on lice in vivo

For the purpose of conducting an experimental infection with biting lice in local chickens, 42 local chickens were used in the experiment. They were confirmed to be free of external and internal parasitic infections through clinical examination and microscopic examination of the feces for a week. They were placed in cages, each cage 1 m long, 0.5 m wide, and 1 m high. Cover the floor with sawdust approximately 4 cm thick. Then the birds were distributed into 10 groups, each containing 3 birds, with the birds being given the final feed. As for water, it is provided in plastic manholes with a capacity of 1 liter, and the experiment was designed as follows: (1) 30 uninfected chickens were taken and placed in special breeding cages prepared for this purpose and described above. (2) The birds were divided into 10 groups (6 experimental groups) and 2 control groups for each one nanomaterial separately (positive and negative), each one containing 3 chickens, and left for a week under control and in ideal conditions. (3) Two naturally infected chickens with heavy lice infestation were placed with each of the experimental groups and left for 2 weeks, anesthetize the chickens using chloroform in very low doses by inhalation and in an open atmosphere in order for the chickens to remain alive and in order to calculate the therapeutic efficiency of chitosan and silver NPs, based on Abbott. (4) The efficiency of NP concentrations of 40, 60, and 80 mg/kg of chitosan compound in eliminating lice was tested by spraying the groups as follows: the first group, G1, with a concentration of 40 mg/kg of chitosan NPs; second group, G2, with a concentration of 60 mg/kg of chitosan NPs; third group, G3, with a concentration of 80 mg/kg of chitosan NP; the fourth group, G4, was left as a positive (infected) group without any treatment; the fifth group, G5, was left as a negative group (uninfected). (5) As for silver NPs, concentrations of 40, 60, and 80 mg/kg were tested by spraying the following groups: the first group, G1, with a concentration of 40 mg/kg of silver NPs; the second group, G2, with a concentration of 60 mg/kg of silver NPs. (6) The third group, G3, with a concentration of 80 mg/kg of silver NPs; the fourth group, G4, was left as a positive (infected) group without any treatment; the fifth group, G5, was left as a negative group (uninfected(.

Solutions of chitosan and silver NPs were sprayed on the areas of the body most affected (butt, Fig. 2) by the concentrations mentioned above, and the feathers were examined after different times of treatment for each concentration, focusing on the most affected area to calculate the rates of infestation of live and dead lice.

Fig. 2.

Chicken butt contain different species of lice (arrow).

Statistical analysis

A completely randomized design was used, with a factorial experiment with 2 factors (concentrations and time periods). The results were tested according to the least significant differences test and at the probability level of p < 0.05.

Results

Effect of different concentrations of chitosan and silver nanoparticles on lice mortality rates in vitro

The results showed, as shown in Table 1, an increase in the rate of lice dead with increasing concentration and duration of exposure to the chitosan and silver NPs, where the rate of lice dead at concentrations of 40, 60, and 80 mg/mL of chitosan NPs after 30 minutes of treatment reached 62.5%, 75.0%, and 100.0% respectively, which represents the highest percentage of lice dead compared to the percentage of dead of lice treated with the same concentrations and shorter periods of time, while the lowest percentage of dead was in the group treated 5 minutes after treatment, as it reached 12.5%, 12.5%, and 50.0% respectively,. The dead rate increased proportionally with time, as the dead rate after 15 minutes reached 50.0%, 62.5%, and 100.0% respectively, followed by the dead rate of lice after 10 minutes of treatment, where the dead rate reached 13%, 38%, and 63% respectively.As for silver NPs, it was observed that the rate of lice dead at concentrations of 40, 60, and 80 mg/mL of silver NPs after 30 minutes of treatment was the best compared to the rest of the other times, as the rate of lice dead reached 75.0%, 87.5%, and 100.0%. The lowest percentage it was also in the treated group after 5 minutes, as the rate of lice dead reached 12.5%, 37.5%, and 50.0%.

Effect of different concentrations of chitosan and sliver nanoparticles on lice mortality rates in vitro

Effect of different concentrations of chitosan and sliver nanoparticles on the rate of lice mortality and the relative therapeutic efficacy of chickens experimentally infected with lice in vivo

The NPs were sprayed on the body of the infected chickens experimentally, and the most affected area of the body was chosen, which was the butt for the purpose of calculating the relative therapeutic efficiency of the NPs within 30 minutes.

The results of the current study, as shown in (Table 2), indicated that the average number of lice in infected chickens treated with chitosan NPs at 3 concentrations of 40, 60, and 80 mg/kg was less than the average number of lice in infected untreated chickens (positive control), with a statistically significant difference at a significance level of p < 0.05. The results of the therapeutic efficiency of chitosan NPs after 30 minutes reached 33%, 66.5%, and 91.5%, respectively. The study showed that the best concentration that led to a reduction in the infection rate in chickens was 80 mg/kg. It is also clear that spraying silver NPs on infected and treated chickens gave valuable results, as it led to a significant reduction in the number of lice, especially at the concentration of 80 mg/kg compared to the negative control group. As for the results of the therapeutic efficiency of the 3 concentrations after 30 minutes, it reached 43.4%. 73.4%, and 96.7%, respectively. The results also showed that silver NPs at a concentration of 80 mg/kg were sufficient to kill lice within 30 minutes.

Effect of different concentrations of chitosan and sliver nanoparticles on the rate of lice mortality and the relative therapeutic efficacy of chickens experimentally infected with lice in vivo at 30 minute

Discussion

Parasites of both external and internal species are treated with anti-parasitic chemical treatments, but over time, resistance to these medications has arisen due to excessive use, while recent years have witnessed tremendous development in the field of nanomedicine to combat parasites, as some NPs have shown promising results in treating various species of parasitic infections [1], where scientists have proven that NPs can be used to treat bacterial, viral, fungal, and parasitic diseases [2].

It is clear from the results of the current study that chitosan and silver NPs have a clear effect on the dead of lice in vitro, and this effect is directly proportional to the increase in concentration and duration of exposure to these particles. The rate of lice dead differed among them depending on the type of nanomaterial used, as the highest rate of lice dead reached within 15 and 30 minutes using 80 mg/mL of chitosan NPs at a rate of 100%, while the percentage of lice killed using silver NPs within 15 minutes was 88%, and the complete killing rate of 100% was achieved within 30 minutes. These results are similar to what some researchers have achieved. In one study, Sioutas et al. [14] used AgNPs as an alternative for treatment and control of the red chicken mite D. gallinae, On the other hand, Barbosa et al. [6] indicated in his experiment on Rhipicephalus ticks, which included 3 different concentrations of chitosan NPs, the ability of these particles to reduce the mass of female tick eggs, Abu-Elala et al. [19] also observed that the chitosan-silver nanocomposite was effective in treating Lernaea cyprinacea infection in goldfish aquariums, Gaafar et al. [20] also demonstrated that chitosan-silver NPs have an effect against Toxoplasma in Swiss albino mice. In addition, many researchers have confirmed that the chitosan-silver nanocomposite has a powerful and destructive antibacterial effect, especially against Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium [21].

After creating an experimental infestation with lice in local chickens, chitosan and silver NPs were sprayed on the chicken’s feathers, focusing on the butt area because it is the most infested area and for easy observation of dead lice because it contains few feathers. This is to calculate the therapeutic efficiency of both materials, as the ideal time was determined as 30 minutes based on this. In the first experiment, which was outside the living body, the effect of the particles used in killing lice varied.

Silver NPs were the most efficient in completely killing lice in the treated group at a concentration of 80 mg/kg after 30 minutes, where the percentage of therapeutic efficiency was 96.7%, followed by chitosan NPs also at a concentration of 80 mg/kg, and the percentage of therapeutic efficiency was 91.5%. These studies are consistent with other studies conducted on other ectoparasites, such as ticks, as Barbosa et al. [6] indicated the possibility of using chitosan NPs as an acaricide in livestock. In another study, Attia et al. [7] concluded that spraying pigeons experimentally infected with the P. canariensis fly with low concentrations of silver and chitosan NPs had an effective role in controlling most of the flies, as it acted as an effective biopesticide. The dead of lice due to nanomaterials can be attributed to the effect of the nervous and digestive system of the insect upon contact with the chitosan and silver NPs, or it may lead to the suffocation of the insect as a result of their entry through the breathing holes or because these NPs come into direct contact with the insect’s body. In this study, nanotechnology opens new facilities for control from the lice. Spray the chicken with nanocomposites of chitosan and silver in low concentrations more effective role to control lice Acts as a powerful biocide. Apply as a spray of chitosan and silver nanocomposites at a concentration of 80 mg/kg on chickens in cages for 30 minutes gave promising results an anti-parasitic agent as well as wound healing caused by an insect bite, with a slight superiority of silver NPs over chitosan.

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author’s Contributions

Conceptualization: Mohammed YQ, Anah SA; Data curation: Mohammed YQ, Anah SA; Formal analysis: Anah SA; Funding acquisition: Anah SA; Investigation: Mohammed YQ, Anah SA; Methodology: Mohammed YQ, Anah SA; Project administration: Anah SA; Resources: Mohammed YQ, Anah SA; Software: Anah SA; Supervision: Anah SA; Validation: Anah SA; Visualization: Anah SA; Writing-original draft: Anah SA; Writing-re­view & editing: Mohammed YQ, Anah SA.

Funding

Funding was provided by author, assist prof. Sadiya Aziz Anah and Youssef Qasim Mohammed.

Acknowledgments

The author is thankful to the management of the University of Al-Qadisiyah for their continuous encouragement and support. Funding was provided by author, assist prof. Sadiya Aziz Anah and Youssef Qasim Mohammed.

References

1. Bajwa HR, Khan MK, Abbas Z, Riaz R, Rehman TU, Abbas RZ, Aleem MT, Abbas A, Almutairi MM, Alshammari FA, Alraey Y, Alouffi A. Nanoparticles: synthesis and their role as potential drug candidates for the treatment of parasitic diseases. Life (Basel) 2022;12:750.
2. Aderibigbe BA. Metal-based nanoparticles for the treatment of infectious diseases. Molecules 2017;22:1370.
3. Khezerlou A, Alizadeh-Sani M, Azizi-Lalabadi M, Ehsani A. Nanoparticles and their antimicrobial properties against pathogens including bacteria, fungi, parasites and viruses. Microb Pathog 2018;123:505–526.
4. Pritt B. Common parasites. Pathology 2020;52(Supplement 1):S49.
5. Mohammed MA, Syeda JT, Wasan KM, Wasan EK. An overview of chitosan nanoparticles and its application in non-parenteral drug delivery. Pharmaceutics 2017;9:53.
6. Barbosa PF, de Mendonça PP, Andrade RD, Aguiar AC, Chaves AR, Silva FG. Efficacy of chitosan supported organic acaricide extract from Melia azedarach leaves on Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus ticks. Afr J Biotechnol 2016;15:1391–1400.
7. Attia MM, Yehia N, Mohamed Soliman M, Shukry M, El-Saadony MT, Salem HM. Evaluation of the antiparasitic activity of the chitosan-silver nanocomposites in the treatment of experimentally infested pigeons with Pseudolynchia canariensis. Saudi J Biol Sci 2022;29:1644–1652.
8. Gurunathan S, Park JH, Han JW, Kim JH. Comparative assessment of the apoptotic potential of silver nanoparticles synthesized by Bacillus tequilensis and Calocybe indica in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells: targeting p53 for anticancer therapy. Int J Nanomedicine 2015;10:4203–4222.
9. Li WR, Xie XB, Shi QS, Zeng HY, Ou-Yang YS, Chen YB. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of silver nanoparticles on Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010;85:1115–1122.
10. Mukherjee P, Ahmad A, Mandal D, Senapati S, Sainkar SR, Khan MI, Parishcha R, Ajaykumar PV, Alam M, Kumar R, Sastry M. Fungus-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their immobilization in the mycelial matrix: a novel biological approach to nanoparticle synthesis. Nano Lett 2001;1:515–519.
11. Chernousova S, Epple M. Silver as antibacterial agent: ion, nanoparticle, and metal. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2013;52:1636–1653.
12. Li C, Zhang Y, Wang M, Zhang Y, Chen G, Li L, Wu D, Wang Q. In vivo real-time visualization of tissue blood flow and angiogenesis using Ag2S quantum dots in the NIR-II window. Biomaterials 2014;35:393–400.
13. Sondi I, Salopek-Sondi B. Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E. coli as a model for Gram-negative bacteria. J Colloid Interface Sci 2004;275:177–182.
14. Sioutas G, Tsouknidas A, Gelasakis AI, Vlachou A, Kaldeli AK, Kouki M, Symeonidou I, Papadopoulos E. In vitro acaricidal activity of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) against the Poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae). Pharmaceutics 2023;15:659.
15. Priyadarshini KA, Murugan K, Panneerselvam C, Ponarulselvam S, Hwang JS, Nicoletti M. Biolarvicidal and pupicidal potential of silver nanoparticles synthesized using Euphorbia hirta against Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera: Culicidae). Parasitol Res 2012;111:997–1006.
16. Soni N, Prakash S. Possible mosquito control by silver nanoparticles synthesized by soil fungus (Aspergillus niger 2587). Adv Nanopart 2013;2:125–132.
17. Soulsby EJ. Helminths, Arthropods and Protozoa of Domesticated Animals. 7th ed. Bailliere Tindall, London, 1982.
18. Haghi M, Hekmatafshar M, Janipour MB, Seyyed S, Faraz MK, Sayyadifar F, Ghaedi M. Antibacterial effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on pathogenic strain of E. coli. Int J Biotechnol Res 2012;3:621–624.
19. Abu-Elala NM, Attia MM, Abd-Elsalam RM. Chitosan-silver nanocomposites in goldfish aquaria: a new perspective in Lernaea cyprinacea control. Int J Biol Macromol 2018;111:614–622.
20. Gaafar MR, Mady RF, Diab RG, Shalaby TI. Chitosan and silver nanoparticles: promising anti-toxoplasma agents. Exp Parasitol 2014;143:30–38.
21. Badawy ME, Lotfy TM, Shawir S. Preparation and antibacterial activity of chitosan-silver nanoparticles for application in preservation of minced meat. Bull Natl Res Cent 2019;43:83.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

(A) Silver nanoparticle. (B) Chitosan nanoparticles.

Fig. 2.

Chicken butt contain different species of lice (arrow).

Table 1.

Effect of different concentrations of chitosan and sliver nanoparticles on lice mortality rates in vitro

Nanoparticle Concentration (mg/mL) 5 min (n = 8) 10 min (n = 8) 15 min (n = 8) 30 min (n = 8)
Chitosan 40 1 (12.5) 1 (12.5) 4 (50.0) 5 (62.5)
Chitosan 60 1 (12.5) 3 (37.5) 5 (62.5) 6 (75.0)
Chitosan 80 4 (50.0) 5 (62.5) 8 (100.0) 8 (100.0)
Sliver 40 1 (12.5) 3 (37.5) 4 (50.0) 6 (75.0)
Sliver 60 3 (37.5) 4 (50.0) 6 (75.0) 7 (87.5)
Sliver 80 4 (50.0) 4 (50.0) 7 (87.5) 8 (100.0)
Control groups 0 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)

Values are presented as number (%).

Table 2.

Effect of different concentrations of chitosan and sliver nanoparticles on the rate of lice mortality and the relative therapeutic efficacy of chickens experimentally infected with lice in vivo at 30 minute

Type of group Nanoparticles (mg/kg) Rate no. of live lice Rate no. of dead lice Relative therapeutic efficacy (%)
G1 Chitosan 40 8 4 33
G2 Chitosan 60 4 8 66.5
G3 Chitosan 80 1 11 91.5
G4 Positive (infected) group 12 0
G5 Negative (uninfected) 0 0 -
G1 Silver 40 5.66 6.34 43.4
G2 Silver 60 2.66 9.34 73.4
G3 Silver 80 0.33 11.67 96.7
G4 Positive (infected) group 12 0 -
G5 Negative (uninfected) group 0 0 -

-, The groups are not included in the treatment.