Histopathological diagnosis and adjuvant therapy with toceranib phosphate in a dog with extraskeletal osteosarcoma: a case report

Article information

Korean J Vet Res. 2025;65.e9
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 June 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.14405/kjvr.20250012
Institute of Animal Medicine and Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea
*Corresponding author: DoHyeon Yu Institute of Animal Medicine and Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, 501 Jinju-daero, Jinju 52828, Korea E-mail: yudh@gnu.ac.kr
Received 2025 March 10; Revised 2025 May 22; Accepted 2025 June 13.

Abstract

In this paper, we explore diagnosing and treating osteosarcoma in the mammary gland using a combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and cyclophosphamide. A case involving a 14-year-old female mixed-breed dog with a 12.4 × 11 cm singular mass in the mammary region is discussed. Initial cytological analysis from a fine-needle aspiration suggested the possibility of mixed-type mammary carcinoma and carcinosarcoma. The mass was surgically excised and sent for histopathological examination, which confirmed it as extraskeletal osteosarcoma of the mammary gland. Following surgery, metronomic chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and fibrocoxib was implemented, along with targeted therapy using toceranib and cyclophosphamide. Seven months post-chemotherapy, the dog exhibited lameness in the right hind limb and metastasis in the 4th thoracic spine. Within 10 months, the condition progressed to tetraparesis, leading to euthanasia 1 month later. This case highlights the need for differential diagnosis among mammary gland mixed-type carcinoma, carcinosarcoma, osseous metaplasia, and osteosarcoma in the context of osteocytes for accurate prognosis. The dog survived 332 days post-surgery with the chemotherapeutic regimen involving toceranib and cyclophosphamide, indicating the effectiveness of TKI and metronomic chemotherapy in extending survival beyond the median for extraskeletal osteosarcoma.

Osteosarcoma of the mammary gland, classified as an extraskeletal osteosarcoma, is exceedingly rare, constituting merely 1% of the tumors [1]. This form can resemble mammary gland carcinosarcoma, typically carries a poor prognosis due to its high rate of metastasis [2,3].

Extraskeletal osteosarcoma is an uncommon malignant mesenchymal tumor that generates osteoid, bone, and cartilage-like material without being directly attached to the bone or periosteum [4]. Instances in dogs have been documented in the mammary glands, liver, esophagus, jejunum, lungs, and more. This is known for its high metastatic rate, reaching up to 64%, and a poor prognosis, with a median survival span ranging from 26 to 90 days [1,5]. Surgical excision remains the primary treatment approach. However, adding chemotherapy post-surgery can improve outcomes, as seen in some veterinary and human studies that report extended survival and disease-free periods with such adjunctive treatments [1,2,6]. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have proven effective for metastatic osteosarcoma by blocking receptor tyrosine kinases involved in cancer growth and spread [7]. Despite these advancements, a standardized chemotherapy regimen following surgery for extraskeletal osteosarcoma is still lacking.

This case report highlights an unusual mammary gland osteosarcoma in a dog, initially presenting as a carcinosarcoma. It also aims to detail the treatment process involving adjunctive chemotherapy with toceranib and cyclophosphamide after the tumor's surgical removal. 

A 14-year-old female mixed-breed dog was brought to the Gyeongsang National University Veterinary Teaching Hospital with a solitary mass located in the mammary gland area. The owner had observed the mass a year earlier, noting an increase in size over the past couple of months. The dog also exhibited symptoms of anorexia and lethargy. There was no previous diagnosis or medication history related to the chief complaint.

Upon physical examination, a singular, firm, and fixed 12.4 × 11 cm mass was detected on the left side, positioned between the second and third mammary glands (Fig. 1). The mass was characterized by ulceration, localized heat, and was tender upon palpation. To determine the cell origin and malignancy features, fine-needle aspiration and cytological analysis were conducted before surgical removal. The cytology showed predominant clusters of cells with acinar formations, along with signs of malignancy such as macronucleoli, binucleate cells, anisocytosis, anisokaryosis, coarse chromatin, and nuclear molding. Mesenchymal and multinucleated cells were also noted. The cytological differential diagnosis leaned towards neoplasia of epithelial origin, suspecting mammary gland adenocarcinoma, carcinoma, or a malignant mixed tumor like carcinosarcoma. Non-cancerous conditions such as hyperplasia, dysplasia, and inflammatory lesions like mastitis were excluded based on the malignant cell characteristics observed.

Fig. 1.

The gross appearance of a firm, fixed, and ulcerated mass located between the second and third mammary glands, measuring 12.4 × 11 cm2.

Diagnostic imaging was performed to delineate the mass boundaries and check for local invasion or distant metastasis. Thoracic radiography identified a 13 × 14 cm round mass with extensive radial mineral opacity in the ventral subcutaneous area of the left second and third teats. Abdominal ultrasound showed a hyperechoic lesion with shadowing and an anechoic to hypoechoic area with minimal blood flow. No regional lymph node enlargement or distant metastasis was detected through imaging.

Laboratory tests indicated moderate microcytic normochromic anemia, neutrophilia with a left shift, elevated C-reactive protein, hyperlactatemia, and a hypercoagulable state. These results suggested a paraneoplastic syndrome associated with the mammary gland tumor.

The dog underwent unilateral chain mastectomy and ovariohysterectomy, with imprint cytology of the removed mammary gland mass showing acinar cell clusters and mesenchymal cells with malignant features, as well as osteoblasts and multinucleated cells (Fig. 2). This led to a differential diagnosis of mammary gland carcinosarcoma and osseous metaplasia.

Fig. 2.

Imprint cytology from the excised mammary gland mass, indicating the presence of osteoblasts and multinucleated osteoclasts. Arrowheads indicate the osteoblasts, and an arrow indicates the multinucleated osteoclasts. Diff-Quick stain, scale bar = 50 μm .

Histopathological analysis revealed neoplastic cells with significant anisocytosis, anisokaryosis, frequent multinucleated cells, and 14 mitoses per 2.37 mm². These cells were supported by fibrovascular stroma and surrounded by narrow bands of pale, eosinophilic, finely fibrillar osteoid material, bone, and cartilage, confirming a definitive diagnosis of extraskeletal osteosarcoma of the mammary gland (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

The histopathological features of the extraskeletal osteosarcoma in the mammary gland. Neoplastic cells with 14 mitoses per 2.37mm2 were supported by fibrovascular stroma and surrounded by narrow bands of pale, eosinophilic, finely fibrillar osteoid material, bone, and cartilage. These cells were supported by fibrovascular stroma and surrounded by narrow bands of pale, eosinophilic, finely fibrillar osteoid material, bone, and cartilage. Hematoxylin and eosin staining, scale bar = 10 μm.

The owner declined systemic chemotherapy with carboplatin or doxorubicin, opting instead for metronomic and targeted chemotherapy with toceranib phosphate (Palladia; Zoetis, USA), alongside cyclophosphamide, firocoxib, misoprostol, and toceranib at specified dosages, with regular monitoring for side effects and metastasis planned monthly.

Afterwards, the dog continued to do well without any abnormalities, but 8 months after the initial presentation, the following clinical signs appeared: right hindlimb lameness, pain, lethargy, and anorexia. Neurological assessment indicated right hind limb ataxia and absence of postural reactions and reflexes, suggesting lumbosacral disc disease, neurological lesions, and tumor spread to the nervous system and bones. Radiographs showed increased numbers and sizes of soft tissue and mineral opacity nodules in the lungs, with additional nodules in the spinal process and ventral aspect of the 4th thoracic vertebra and left scapula, indicating suspected progressive metastasis of the extraskeletal osteosarcoma. The dog was prescribed prednisolone, tramadol, and gabapentin for neuropathic pain management without further investigation, according to the owner’s request.

Ultimately, the owner opted for euthanasia on the 332nd day post-presentation due to tetraparesis attributed to tumor metastasis. Postmortem computed tomography (CT) scans revealed soft tissue nodules and mineral deposits in various organs and bones, including the lungs, heart, liver, kidneys, ribs, scapula, thoracic vertebrae, sacrum, and lymph nodes, confirming widespread metastasis of the extraskeletal osteosarcoma.

The clinical significance of this study lies in the diagnosis and management of extraskeletal osteosarcoma of the mammary gland in dogs. Identifying mammary gland osteosarcomas can be difficult due to the cytological similarities it shares with conditions such as carcinosarcoma, mixed-type carcinoma, and osteoid metaplasia.

Definitive diagnosis for mammary gland mass, along with histopathological classification and prognostic assessment, requires histopathology. The mammary gland comprises luminal epithelial cells and myoepithelial cells, the latter of which are thought to originate from mesenchymal metaplasia or mesenchymal tumors. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) helps differentiate between carcinoma and sarcoma when cytological findings are ambiguous. In some studies, vimentin-supported IHC confirmed sarcoma diagnosis, while Ki67 indicated sarcoma proliferation levels [8]. In this case, histopathology indicated mammary gland osteosarcoma due to the notable osteoid tissue and osteoblast features. Further IHC was not conducted as no epithelial malignancy was evident in cytology.

Distinguishing between mammary gland osteosarcoma, mixed-type carcinoma, and carcinosarcoma is crucial for understanding disease progression, prognosis, and treatment strategies. While the TNM staging system is used for mammary gland carcinoma, it isn't applied to sarcomas. For osteosarcoma, staging involves histopathological grading, anatomical location, and metastasis. Osteosarcomas typically spread hematogenously, leading to frequent lung metastasis, unlike carcinomas that spread via lymphatics. Studies have shown a higher rate of lung metastasis in sarcomas compared to carcinomas. Thus, evaluating distant metastasis is critical in osteosarcoma cases, as demonstrated by CT scans in this case, showing metastasis to bones leading to tetraparesis.

Surgical excision of extraskeletal osteosarcoma is an effective approach, improving survival in both veterinary and human medicine [6,9,10]. However, the role of adjunctive radiotherapy or chemotherapy remains debated due to limited studies and a lack of consensus on protocols, attributed to the rarity of the condition. Therefore, case reports highlighting survival and prognosis in extraskeletal osteosarcoma are vital for developing systemic treatment strategies. In both human and veterinary contexts, adjunctive chemotherapy extends survival and disease-free intervals [11,12]. Studies have shown better outcomes with chemotherapy like carboplatin or cyclophosphamide, compared to surgery alone [13]. Toceranib, a TKI, effectively targets cancer cell pathways, influencing tumor growth and differentiation. It has shown efficacy in treating mast cell tumors, carcinomas, and sarcomas, including canine mammary gland tumors, by inducing apoptosis and cell cycle arrest [14,15].

Numerous research and case reports suggest the potential benefits of toceranib in osteosarcoma treatment, though further studies are needed due to the disease's rarity and current lack of established protocols for extraskeletal osteosarcoma [1619]. In a separate study on extraskeletal osteosarcoma, chemotherapy emerged as the sole prognostic factor. Dogs that did not undergo chemotherapy faced a 3.62-fold increased risk of dying from tumor-related causes compared to those that did receive chemotherapy [2]. Within this study, out of 14 dogs with extraskeletal osteosarcoma, 2 cases involving mammary gland osteosarcoma were treated with doxorubicin administered 5 times at 3-week intervals following mastectomy. Their survival time were 223 and 185 days, respectively, marking the longest survival among the 14 dogs [2]. In this case, although receptor tyrosine kinase was not confirmed through IHC, an oral chemotherapy agent was chosen due to various reasons such as the owner’s intention, cost, and time constraints. Based on existing literature confirming the efficacy of TKI, toceranib was prescribed. Mammary gland osteosarcoma is aggressive, with a median survival time of 90 days, primarily due to pulmonary metastasis. Despite a generally poor prognosis, this case achieved longer survival (approximately 300 days), likely due to TKI as adjunctive chemotherapy. This case illustrates the practical application of toceranib after tumor removal, providing clinical insight into TKI efficacy in osteosarcoma management.

The limitation of this case was the absence of alkaline phosphatase staining in cytology and IHC staining, which could aid in diagnosing extraskeletal mammary gland osteosarcoma. Additionally, further diagnostics were not conducted, leaving uncertainty about metastasis in the skeletal and nervous systems. Moreover, platinum-based chemotherapy, a highly effective option for osteosarcoma, was not utilized. Future studies are needed to assess the prognostic value of systemic chemotherapy in treating extraskeletal osteosarcoma in veterinary practice. In conclusion, it underscores the importance of histopathology over cytology for accurate diagnosis and the necessity of considering mesenchymal neoplasms in differential diagnoses. Differentiating between sarcoma and carcinoma is crucial for predicting survival, metastasis sites, and treatment options. Based on this diagnosis, although a short survival with potential metastases was anticipated, the dog had survived longer after the use of adjunctive chemotherapy for improved outcomes.

Notes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author’s Contributions

Conceptualization: all authors; Data curation: all authors; Formal analysis: Bae H; Funding acquisition: Yu D; Investigation: Bae H; Methodology: Bae H; Project administration: Yu D; Supervision: Yu D; Writing–original draft: all authors; Writing–review & editing: all authors.

Funding

This research was supported by Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry (IPET) through Companion Animal Life Cycle Industry Technology Development Program, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (322092-04-1-HD030), contributing to the realization of social value and the development of national science and technology.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to take this opportunity to thank the dog and his owner for their unwavering support and love throughout this research.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

1. Langenbach A, Anderson MA, Dambach DM, Sorenmo KU, Shofer FD. Extraskeletal osteosarcomas in dogs: a retrospective study of 169 cases (1986-1996). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1998;34:113–120. 10.5326/15473317-34-2-113. 9507423.
2. Kuntz CA, Dernell WS, Powers BE, Withrow S. Extraskeletal osteosarcomas in dogs: 14 cases. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1998;34:26–30. 10.5326/15473317-34-1-26. 9527426.
3. Selmic LE, Griffin LR, Rector MH, Lafferty M, Pool R, Ehrhart NP. Treatment of extraskeletal osteosarcoma at a previous injection site resulting in prolonged survival in 1 dog. Can Vet J 2016;57:950–954. 27587886.
4. Norrdin RW, Lebel JL, Chitwood JS. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1971;158:729–734. 10.2460/javma.1971.158.06.729. 5280079.
5. Patnaik AK. Canine extraskeletal osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma: a clinicopathologic study of 14 cases. Vet Pathol 1990;27:46–55. 10.1177/030098589002700107. 2309381.
6. Paludo J, Fritchie K, Haddox CL, Rose PS, Arndt CA, Marks RS, et al. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma: outcomes and the role of chemotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol 2018;41:832–837. 10.1097/COC.0000000000000397. 28622153.
7. Tian Z, Niu X, Yao W. Receptor tyrosine kinases in osteosarcoma treatment: which is the key target? Front Oncol 2020;10:1642. 10.3389/fonc.2020.01642. 32984034.
8. Dolka I, Sapierzyński R, Król M. Retrospective study and immunohistochemical analysis of canine mammary sarcomas. BMC Vet Res 2013;9:248. 10.1186/1746-6148-9-248. 24321325.
9. Liao Z, Qiu M, Yang J, Yang Y, Zhu L, Yang B, et al. Outcomes of surgery and/or combination chemotherapy for extraskeletal osteosarcoma: a single-center retrospective study from China. Sci Rep 2019;9:4816. 10.1038/s41598-019-41089-1. 30886189.
10. Longhi A, Bielack SS, Grimer R, Whelan J, Windhager R, Leithner A, et al. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma: a European Musculoskeletal Oncology Society study on 266 patients. Eur J Cancer 2017;74:9–16. 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.12.016. 28167373.
11. Berg J, Gebhardt MC, Rand WM. Effect of timing of postoperative chemotherapy on survival of dogs with osteosarcoma. Cancer 1997;79:1343–1350. 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970401)79:7<1343::aid-cncr11>3.0.co;2-#. 9083156.
12. Tarone L, Mareschi K, Tirtei E, Giacobino D, Camerino M, Buracco P, et al. Improving osteosarcoma treatment: comparative oncology in action. Life (Basel) 2022;12:2099. 10.3390/life12122099. 36556464.
13. Duffy D, Selmic LE, Kendall AR, Powers BE. Outcome following treatment of soft tissue and visceral extraskeletal osteosarcoma in 33 dogs: 2008-2013. Vet Comp Oncol 2017;15:46–54. 10.1111/vco.12141. 25643914.
14. Argyle DJ. Molecular/targeted therapy of cancer. In : Withrow SJ, Vail DM, Page RL, eds. Withrow and MacEwen’s Small Animal Clinical Oncology 5th edth ed. Elsevier; 2012. p. 215–244.
15. Ustun-Alkan F, Bakırel T, Üstüner O, Anlas C, Cinar S, Yıldırım F, et al. Effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitor-masitinib mesylate on canine mammary tumour cell lines. J Vet Res 2021;65:351–359. 10.2478/jvetres-2021-042. 34917849.
16. Mauchle U, Selvarajah GT, Mol JA, Kirpensteijn J, Verheije MH. Identification of anti-proliferative kinase inhibitors as potential therapeutic agents to treat canine osteosarcoma. Vet J 2015;205:281–287. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.08.006. 25190293.
17. Fahey CE, Milner RJ, Kow K, Bacon NJ, Salute ME. Apoptotic effects of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor, masitinib mesylate, on canine osteosarcoma cells. Anticancer Drugs 2013;24:519–526. 10.1097/cad.0b013e32836002ba. 23466652.
18. Maniscalco L, Iussich S, Morello E, Martano M, Biolatti B, Riondato F, et al. PDGFs and PDGFRs in canine osteosarcoma: new targets for innovative therapeutic strategies in comparative oncology. Vet J 2013;195:41–47. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.05.003. 22704137.
19. Cheon J, Kim J, Bae S. Disease progression and treatment of mammary gland osteosarcoma in a dog: a case report. J Vet Clin 2025;42:83–88. 10.17555/jvc.2025.42.2.83.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

The gross appearance of a firm, fixed, and ulcerated mass located between the second and third mammary glands, measuring 12.4 × 11 cm2.

Fig. 2.

Imprint cytology from the excised mammary gland mass, indicating the presence of osteoblasts and multinucleated osteoclasts. Arrowheads indicate the osteoblasts, and an arrow indicates the multinucleated osteoclasts. Diff-Quick stain, scale bar = 50 μm .

Fig. 3.

The histopathological features of the extraskeletal osteosarcoma in the mammary gland. Neoplastic cells with 14 mitoses per 2.37mm2 were supported by fibrovascular stroma and surrounded by narrow bands of pale, eosinophilic, finely fibrillar osteoid material, bone, and cartilage. These cells were supported by fibrovascular stroma and surrounded by narrow bands of pale, eosinophilic, finely fibrillar osteoid material, bone, and cartilage. Hematoxylin and eosin staining, scale bar = 10 μm.